C# IStructuralEquatable nerelerde kullanılıyor Sırları

C# IStructuralEquatable nerelerde kullanılıyor Sırları

Blog Article

That is, you birey create your own definition of structural equality and specify that this definition be used with a collection type that accepts the IStructuralEquatable interface.

= to provide value equality checks (vs the default reference equality check). The MSDN documentation suggests you only do it for immutable types. There are also issues involving interfaces and operator overloading.

Reference types (read classes) don't benefit bey much. The IEquatable implementation does let you avoid a cast from System.Object but that's a very trivial gain. I still like IEquatable to be implemented for my classes since it logically makes the intent explicit.

LBushkinLBushkin 131k3333 gold badges217217 silver badges265265 bronze badges 11 8 Why birey't you just specify an IEqualityComparer yourself that does this? What does the IStructuralEquatable interface add to this?

Kakım an example, it might make sense for two different instances of an Employee class to be considered equal if they both represent the same entity in your system.

Structural equality means that two objects are equal because they have equal values. It differs from reference equality, which indicates that two object references are equal because they reference the same physical object. The IStructuralEquatable interface enables you to implement customized comparisons to check for the structural equality of collection objects.

1 My understanding is that it's used for collection like types, and encapsulates the structural part of the comparison, but leaved the comparison of the elements to a comparer passed in by the user. But I'm derece really sure if I really got it.

When an implementer overrides the virtual Equals method in a struct, the purpose is to provide a more efficient means of performing the value equality check and optionally to base the comparison on some subset of the struct's field or properties.

Başka bir ifadeyle, kendi strüktürel denklik tanılamamınızı oluşturabilir ve bu teşhismın arabirimi ikrar IStructuralEquatable fail bir koleksiyon türüyle kullanılacağını belirtebilirsiniz. Arabirimin dü üyesi vardır: Equals, tamlanan IEqualityComparer bir uygulamayı kullanarak eşitliği test değer ve GetHashCodeeşit olan nesneler karınin aynı karma kodları döndürür.

If you read this entire post and are thinking wow that is a lot of code and steps to remember then do hamiş fear because Dustin told me and showed me that Visual Studio will generate all of this for you!!!!! Check this C# IStructuralEquatable nerelerde kullanılıyor out:

Each of your objects should use a hashcode based on the contents of the object. If you have a value type containing 3 ints, use those when computing the hash code. Like this, all objects with identical content will have the same hash code, independent of app domain and other circumstances.

The example on MSDN gives part of the answer here; it seems to be useful for heterogeneous equality, rather than homogeneous equality - i.e. for testing whether two objects (/values) of potentially different types

GetHashCode does not return unique values for instances that are hamiş equal. However, instances that are equal will always return the same hash code.

Fantasy TV series with a male protagonist who uses a bow and arrows and başmaklık a hawk/falcon/eagle type bird companion